Electronic signatures in Panama are legally recognized by Law 51 of 2008 as amended by Law 82 of 2012. A simple electronic signature is valid where it allows the signatory to be identified and their acceptance of the document to be shown, while the qualified electronic signature enjoys an automatic legal presumption of validity.
The National Directorate of Electronic Signature is the directorate of the Public Registry of Panama in charge of this field. It is the Public Registry, through that directorate, that authorizes and registers certification service providers, and that also acts as the national government’s own provider.
Law 51 of 2008, as amended by Law 82 of 2012, defines the electronic signature and the qualified electronic signature as follows:
Electronic signature. A technical method to identify a person and to indicate that this person approves the information contained in a data message or electronic document.
Qualified electronic signature. An electronic signature whose validity is backed by a qualified electronic certificate that:
The same law defines the legal value of the electronic signature: where the law requires a person’s signature, or attaches consequences to its absence, that requirement is satisfied by a data message if a method has been used to identify the originator and to indicate that the content has their approval, and if that method is reliable and appropriate for the purpose for which the message was generated or communicated.
Both requirements are presumed as a matter of law where there is a qualified electronic signature and, therefore, where a certification service provider authorized by the National Directorate of Electronic Signature took part in issuing it.
There is a doctrinal distinction between what is called the simple electronic signature and the qualified electronic signature. Both have legal value, the fundamental distinction being that the qualified one carries a presumption of validity as a matter of law.
The qualified electronic signature is the one issued by a certification service provider registered with the National Directorate of Electronic Signature, and also the one issued by the Public Registry of Panama itself as the national government’s provider under Law 82 of 2012.
In short: for a simple electronic signature to have legal value in litigation, it has to be proven. The qualified electronic signature enters the proceedings, in principle, in a far stronger position, with a presumption of validity conferred by the law itself that requires no proof. In theory, the qualified electronic signature has automatic legal validity.
The SHA-256 hash algorithm is, alongside the elliptic curve algorithm ECDSA and RSA, among the most widely used for the digital signature, the advanced electronic signature, or the qualified or certified electronic signature depending on the country. It is a cryptographic hash function from the SHA-2 family, designed by the National Security Agency and standardized by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST).
It takes any amount of data —text, a file, a password, a document— and transforms it into a fixed mathematical fingerprint of 256 bits. That unintelligible numeric result is called the hash or digest.
In digital certificates, advanced and qualified electronic signatures, time stamping and document integrity. In PKI systems the whole document is normally not signed: what gets signed is the document’s SHA-256 hash.
The typical signing process is: the SHA-256 of the document is computed; that hash is signed with the signatory’s private key using, for example, 2048-bit RSA with SHA-256; the recipient recomputes the hash; and if both hashes match, the document was not altered and the signature is valid.
It is also used for integrity verification —software downloads, digital evidence, legal documents— and in blockchain: Bitcoin uses SHA-256 in its mining and block-chaining mechanism.
The full text of both laws is published in the Official Gazette of the Republic of Panama, in Spanish:
For more detail you can read my essay Quick guide to electronic signatures in Panama, freely available, and the comparative table of electronic signatures and e-invoicing in Central America and part of the Caribbean. Both are in Spanish.
My essay on the legal framework for electronic signatures in the Republic of Panama. Free access, no sign-up.
Download the essay →Rules, regulations and governing bodies across eight jurisdictions of Central America and part of the Caribbean, in a single table.
View the comparison →Both have legal value. The fundamental distinction is that the qualified electronic signature carries a presumption of validity as a matter of law. A simple signature has to be proven in litigation; a qualified one enters the proceedings with a presumption of validity conferred by the law itself, which requires no proof.
Law 51 of 2008, as amended by Law 82 of 2012. A qualified electronic signature requires a qualified electronic certificate issued by a certification service provider registered with the National Directorate of Electronic Signature of the Public Registry of Panama.
All certification service providers (PSC) duly authorized and registered by the Public Registry of Panama, and that institution itself acting as the national government’s PSC through the National Directorate of Electronic Signature, under Law 82 of 2012.
A signature made abroad can have legal value in Panama, but the automatic presumption of validity attaches to the qualified electronic signature as defined by Panamanian law — that is, one issued through a certification service provider registered with the National Directorate of Electronic Signature. For a cross-border transaction, that is the point to review before signing, not after.
Write to me with the details of your matter and I will reply with scope, timeline and cost.